Unusual Journal Entry Review

Focus journal review on entries matching the business's defined risk criteria. This application is designed to organise flagged records, supporting evidence and reviewer notes without treating an unusual transaction as proof of an accounting error.

Best suited to

Finance teams reviewing selected journal entry exceptions.

What you can manage

• Define the risk rules used to select entries for review.
• Identify journals matching the entered exception criteria.
• Associate supporting documents with the selected records.
• Maintain notes from the review of each entry.
• Record the decision that resolves the exception.

A practical workflow

Set the selection rules and review the resulting journal population. Examine the source evidence before deciding whether an entry is valid, needs clarification or requires correction, then retain the documented outcome.

Why this workflow matters

A flagged record is the start of a review, not a conclusion about wrongdoing. Keeping the selection rule, supporting evidence and reviewer decision together helps the business assess the specific issue fairly and document the action taken. Findings should be interpreted within the scope and quality of the available data.

Working with your records

Define the review population, internal rules and responsible decision-maker before interpreting an exception or control result. Examine the supporting evidence and document the conclusion reached. The software organises review work and findings; it does not guarantee fraud detection, prevent every accounting error or replace an independent assurance engagement.

Licence

12-month software licence purchased with a one-time payment. The purchase covers the stated licence term and does not create an automatically renewing subscription.